Among the world’s marginalized communities, the Rohingya people are often cited as one of the most persecuted. This ethnic group, originating from Myanmar’s Rakhine State, has endured centuries of discrimination, systemic violence, and forced displacement. Despite recent international awareness of their plight, the Rohingya’s suffering continues, largely unmitigated. Their story is one of resilience and survival in the face of state-sponsored persecution, brutal violence, and enduring statelessness. This article examines the historical origins of the Rohingya, the roots of their marginalization, the rise of ethnic tensions, and the ongoing crisis that has forced hundreds of thousands from their homeland.
Historical Roots of the Rohingya People
The Rohingya’s history is deeply intertwined with the Rakhine region, also known as Arakan, in what is now western Myanmar. Their origins are believed to be a blend of various groups, including Arab, Bengali, and Persian traders who arrived in the area as early as the 7th century, establishing settlements and intermarrying with local communities. This historical migration and cultural exchange laid the foundation for a unique cultural and religious identity that would come to be known as the Rohingya.
The term “Rohingya” itself is derived from “Rohang,” an ancient name for the Rakhine region, and has come to represent the Muslim population indigenous to this area. Historical records suggest that the influence of Islam in Arakan dates back as early as the 9th century, gaining prominence with the Bengal Sultanate’s expansion in the 15th century. The rise of the Mrauk-U Kingdom from the 15th to the 18th centuries saw a significant period of cultural and religious coexistence, with the Rohingya and Buddhist communities living side by side. This period, while largely peaceful, also sowed seeds of tension that would resurface in later centuries as political dynamics shifted.
In 1784, the annexation of Arakan by the Kingdom of Burma marked a turning point in the Rohingya’s history. Burmese rulers marginalized the Rohingya population, treating them as a religious and ethnic minority with little political influence. This subjugation laid the groundwork for centuries of systematic exclusion, discrimination, and violence, establishing a pattern that would continue into the British colonial period and beyond.
The Impact of British Colonialism and Escalation of Ethnic Tensions
The arrival of British colonial forces in the 19th century further complicated the situation in Arakan. Following a series of conquests, the British incorporated Burma into British India in 1886, prompting large-scale migrations from Bengal into Burma, including the Arakan region. This migration, often encouraged by the British to serve economic interests, brought Bengali Muslims into close proximity with the indigenous Rohingya population, which increased the region’s Muslim demographic and strained existing relations with local Buddhist communities.
Under British rule, economic incentives drove this migration, as the colonial administration sought to exploit Arakan’s fertile lands for agriculture. The influx of Bengali laborers fueled resentment among the local Buddhist population, who viewed the Rohingya and other Muslims as economic competitors and outsiders, despite the Rohingya’s deep historical ties to the region. This perception of Muslims as foreign interlopers would later become a powerful tool for nationalist groups, who leveraged these sentiments to ostracize and vilify the Rohingya.
By the time Burma achieved independence in 1948, ethnic and religious tensions were deeply ingrained. Although the Rohingya had centuries-old roots in the region, the dominant Buddhist population increasingly viewed them as foreigners, largely due to the recent migration patterns encouraged by British rule. This growing animosity laid the foundation for post-independence policies and attitudes that would further entrench the Rohingya’s marginalized status.
Post-Independence Discrimination and the 1982 Citizenship Law
After Burma’s independence, the Rohingya initially enjoyed some degree of acceptance and were granted certain citizenship rights. During the early years, they participated in political life, with some serving in government and the military. However, as Burmese nationalism grew, particularly among the Buddhist majority, the Rohingya were increasingly marginalized, seen as outsiders in the new Burmese nation-state.
A pivotal moment came in 1982, when Myanmar’s military regime enacted a new citizenship law that redefined the parameters of Burmese identity. This law categorized citizens into three tiers: full, associate, and naturalized. The Rohingya were excluded from all categories, as they were not recognized among the “135 national races” of Myanmar. As a result, the law rendered the Rohingya stateless, stripping them of basic citizenship rights and legal protections. Without citizenship, the Rohingya lost access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities, while their movement was restricted, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation and abuse.
The 1982 Citizenship Law marked the beginning of a new phase of institutionalized discrimination. With no legal recognition, the Rohingya were effectively erased from official Burmese identity, leading to decades of deprivation and insecurity. They became subject to forced labor, land confiscation, arbitrary arrests, and widespread human rights abuses. The denial of citizenship created a profound legal and social exclusion that the Rohingya have yet to overcome.
The Rise of Anti-Rohingya Sentiment and State-Sanctioned Violence
In the years following the 1982 citizenship law, anti-Rohingya sentiment became entrenched in Myanmar, stoked by Buddhist nationalist rhetoric that depicted the Rohingya as illegal immigrants from Bangladesh and a threat to Myanmar’s cultural integrity. This animosity culminated in a series of violent episodes, beginning with the Rakhine State riots in 2012, when clashes erupted between Rohingya Muslims and Rakhine Buddhists. These riots resulted in hundreds of deaths, widespread destruction, and the forced displacement of thousands of Rohingya, many of whom were placed in internment camps where they remain to this day.
The situation deteriorated further in 2016, following attacks by Rohingya insurgents under the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA). In retaliation, the Myanmar military launched brutal “clearance operations” targeting the Rohingya population. These operations, which escalated in 2017, were characterized by widespread atrocities, including mass killings, sexual violence, and the burning of villages. Human rights organizations and international observers labeled these actions as ethnic cleansing, with some suggesting that they constituted genocide.
By the end of 2017, more than 700,000 Rohingya had fled Myanmar, seeking refuge in Bangladesh. Today, they live in overcrowded refugee camps, such as Kutupalong, which has become the largest refugee camp in the world. These camps, while offering sanctuary, are fraught with challenges, including lack of resources, inadequate sanitation, and persistent health crises. Thousands more remain internally displaced within Myanmar, stripped of their homes and livelihoods.
The Refugee Crisis and International Response
The exodus of Rohingya refugees in 2017 brought international attention to their plight, with harrowing images of burned villages and overcrowded camps circulating globally. The United Nations described the military’s actions as a “textbook example of ethnic cleansing,” while the International Criminal Court (ICC) opened an investigation into potential crimes against humanity committed against the Rohingya. Human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch documented the atrocities, urging global intervention.
However, despite international condemnation and ongoing investigations, meaningful action to hold Myanmar accountable has been limited. Political complexities, including Myanmar’s denial of wrongdoing and claims of conducting legitimate counterinsurgency, have hindered efforts to implement justice. Aung San Suu Kyi, once celebrated as a symbol of democracy, faced criticism for defending the military’s actions, a stance that has complicated international intervention and contributed to the Rohingya’s continued suffering.
For those Rohingya who fled to Bangladesh, life in the refugee camps remains precarious. With limited resources, the Bangladesh government struggles to accommodate such a large population. Although initially welcoming, Bangladeshi officials have expressed concerns about the long-term sustainability of these camps and have attempted to initiate repatriation efforts, which have failed due to the lack of guarantees for the Rohingya’s safety and basic rights upon their return.
Assessing the Genocidal Nature of the Rohingya Crisis
While the violence against the Rohingya is often referred to as “ethnic cleansing,” many scholars and legal experts argue that it meets the criteria for genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. According to the convention, genocide is defined as acts intended to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. The systematic violence directed at the Rohingya—mass killings, forced deportations, and the intentional destruction of their cultural and religious sites—suggests a calculated effort to eliminate them as a distinct ethnic group.
The Rohingya crisis is not merely about mass displacement but also the deliberate erasure of their identity. The Myanmar government has attempted to rewrite history by labeling the Rohingya as “Bengalis” or illegal immigrants, despite their centuries-long presence in Rakhine. This denial of their identity, combined with the extensive violence and systematic exclusion, supports the assertion that Myanmar’s actions constitute genocide. International efforts to address these crimes are ongoing, but progress remains limited due to political obstacles and Myanmar’s resistance to external scrutiny.
Conclusion: The Rohingya Crisis – A Modern Humanitarian Tragedy
The Rohingya people’s plight serves as a sobering reminder of the dangers posed by ethnic nationalism, religious intolerance, and state-sponsored persecution. Despite their centuries-long history in the Rakhine region, the Rohingya have been systematically denied basic human rights, stripped of citizenship, and subjected to brutal violence that has forced them into statelessness.
While international advocacy has shone a spotlight on their suffering, the global response has yet to produce significant change. The Rohingya remain one of the largest stateless populations, trapped in a cycle of violence, displacement, and deprivation with limited prospects for a peaceful future. Their story is a modern humanitarian tragedy that calls for sustained international commitment, accountability, and humanitarian support.
In a world where human rights are professed as universal, the Rohingya crisis underscores the ongoing challenge of addressing systemic discrimination and violence. Their struggle stands as both a call to action and a cautionary tale, highlighting the consequences when the world fails to protect its most vulnerable populations. Only through concerted global efforts can there be hope for justice, safety, and a dignified future for the Rohingya people.
2 thoughts on “The Untold Story of the Stateless Rohingya People”